Register Login
Policy · Guidelines · Practice

AI Comprehensive Guide

Responsibly use artificial intelligence to enhance research efficiency and academic integrity. From policy interpretation to tool application, master the best path to AI-powered academia.

AI Policy Core Summary

  • Transparency Clearly disclose the scope and manner of AI tool usage in manuscripts.
  • Author Responsibility Authors bear full responsibility for the accuracy and originality of AI-generated content.
  • No Co-authorship AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author.
  • Data Privacy Do not input unpublished manuscripts or peer review comments into public generative AI tools.
  • Image Ethics AI-generated images must be indicated in captions, and research data must not be falsified.
Read Full Policy →

Academic Writing & AI Assistance

Language Polishing & Translation

AI tools may be used to improve language expression and readability, but accuracy of terminology and clarity of logic must be ensured. Disclosure in Methods or Acknowledgments is recommended.

Recommended tools: Academic Translation, DeepL Write · Manual review required after use

Literature Search & Review

AI can assist with rapid literature screening and summarization, but final selection and critical analysis must be done by authors. Citations should be verified against original sources.

Based on OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar · Treat AI-generated summaries with caution

Data Analysis & Code

When AI assists with code or statistical script generation, authors should verify code logic and results. AI involvement should be disclosed in the data availability statement.

Provide original code repository · Transparent processing workflow

Charts & Visualization

When using AI to generate diagrams or covers, data must not be distorted. All AI-generated images must be labeled "AI-generated" in captions.

StarNexus provides compliant cover generation tools, following COPE guidelines

Peer Review · Publishing Ethics

Reviewer Notice

Reviewers must not upload manuscript content to any public AI platforms. If using AI to assist with review comments, disclosure is required and confidentiality must be ensured.

Violating confidentiality agreements may result in loss of reviewer status

Editor Decision Support

Editors may use AI for plagiarism detection, format checking, or initial screening, but all academic decisions must be made independently by the editorial team.

StarNexus uses iThenticate and internal AI detection

AI Content Detection

The publisher reserves the right to detect AI-generated content in submissions. Undeclared AI content affecting originality may result in manuscript return.

Honest disclosure is the best strategy

AI Tools & Resources Integration

The following tools are integrated into the StarNexus platform, free for Diamond OA authors and editorial board members. All tools follow data minimization principles.

Browse All AI Tools →

Common Scenarios · Best Practices

Can I use ChatGPT to write the introduction?

It can be used for brainstorming or polishing, but large paragraphs of AI-generated text should not be directly copied. Disclosure in acknowledgments or methods is required.

Do I still need language editing proof after AI assistance?

If AI was only used for preliminary polishing, usually not required; but if the journal requires professional editing, using human editing services with disclosure is recommended.

What if I suspect AI-generated content during peer review?

Contact the editorial office with specific passages. Editors will communicate with authors based on policy; manuscripts will not be rejected solely due to AI traces.

How to cite AI tools?

Both APA and MLA have guidelines. Typically, describe the tool name, version, and usage in the methods section; no need to include in references.